To the Top

Environmental consideration historical-cultural values

03. Percentage (%) of known cultural heritage sites affected by regeneration felling by type of cultural heritage site and degree of damage. Year (five-year average) 2014-2023

Logotype for official statistics
Mandatory

Selected 0 of total 2

Mandatory
Field for searching for a specific value in the list box. This is examples of values you can search for.Building remains , Charcoal production sites , Trap pits ,

Selected 0 of total 14

Mandatory

Selected 0 of total 3

Mandatory
Field for searching for a specific value in the list box. This is examples of values you can search for.2014 , 2015 , 2016 ,

Selected 1 of total 10

Number of selected data cells are:
(maximum number allowed is 100,000)

Presentation on screen is limited to 1,000 rows and 100 columns

Number of selected cells exceeds the maximum allowed 100,000

Obs:

Year (Five-year average) is given as the middle year, for example 2018-2022=2020. Cultural heritage sites includes all historical-cultural values.
A site might be damaged by several damage causes. The highest degree of damage decides a site's overall degree of damage. Degree of damage:
None damage
Impact - an impact that can be restored. Examples include minor vehicle ruts, felling debris, and compression damage.
Damage - damage that can be restored. Examples include vehicle ruts, certain types of soil scarification, and substantial accumulation of felling debris.
Severe damage - irreversible damage that cannot be restored. Examples include soil scarification, vehicle ruts, or uprooted trees, all of which may expose underlying cultural layers.

Databasen består mestadels av statistik som ingår i Sveriges officiella statistik. / The database consists mostly of statistics included in the Official Statistics of Sweden.